Heidelbergensis

I read the selfish gene because I'm interested in evolutionary biology. Women my age won't be impressed or care about a book I'm reading; that's a ridiculous point to bring up and try to paint me as a douchebag who's only reading it "to get chicks" I already have a girlfriend and she couldn't care less about the selfish gene. Maybe you could infer that I'm curious about evolutionary biology based on my Name alone.

Can I name the Blonde and the Dorky Abrasive Social-stunted nerd? What's the worthiness of that, lol? There's no point in asking that question on an internet forum. It isn't real life where if you ask that to someone on the spot, they have to reply with only the knowledge they have offhand within a reasonable time frame. On the internet, I can just google up the characters and provide you with a satisfactory answer, despite having no knowledge of the show (by my own admission) and either you believe that I have adequate knowledge of the show, or that I don't, and simply "googled it". There

With every condescending reply, (ie "go eat a Luna bar") you prove that you are no better than what you purport to be against; me and this thread. So thank you for proving that you aren't above insults, and degradation, all while pretending that I'm the one being mean and unreasonable. At least I haven't actually insulted an actual person, I've only spoken negatively a lot fictional characters in a TV Show, and I've been intelligence-bashed, stereotyped, and generally put down, all because you don't agree with me. Again, thank you for defeating yourselves, it saves me the trouble of having to

The show is not realistically portraying men OR Women, it's insulting to anyone with an actual social disease like Autism or Asperger's Syndrome. That's what's insulting. And I've watched enough of it to get the general gist of their antics and behaviors. 10/10 blondes going for the geeky and abrasive guy who would rather play an MMORPG than pay attention to them; right, that's realistic for sure.

I am speaking from the point of view of man. You can't deny that you don't see a lot of really geeky guys romantically involved with very, very good looking women. There are always exceptions to the rule.

Why do they play this show at the Gym? There's many TVs, and some of them happen to be on the right channel at the right time. It's probably coincidental. Although they are mainly TBS re-runs.

"Just as it's a logical failing to see some intelligent person and assume they don't have the ability to date woman. But you don't seem to mind using it. As a matter of fact, you complain about various examples we use, when you are using the same thing." At best, this is a strawman, and at worse, invincible ignorance fallacy. You disregard the other traits they have, other than "being smart" They are Awkward. They are abrasive, they are sometimes mean and insensitive. It's not simply them being Normal, but they're smart, and therefore have the ability to date women. Anyone has the abil

I'm not sure what you mean by "Emotional IQ" Do you mean the ability to read someone's emotion? Do you mean being able to be sympathize with someone on an emotional level? Do you mean valuing an emotional bond with someone over all other attributes? These are all things that I am capable of. But until you define exactly what you mean by "Emotional IQ" it's just a Buzzword to me. Also, how exactly am I narcissistic? I was accused of being shallow or "compensating" for something in this thread, so I refuted that by describing myself. I'm no more vain than the next man. Do I recognize

There's these things called "Smartphones" You can do a surprising amount of things on them. Signing up for these forums and writing that post took all of 20 minutes, less than one set of Cardio. Anyone here going to even address my points, or did I waste my time?

It's obviously walking into a hornet's nest posting what I have, but no one has refuted what I said. It's all been basically a bunch of feel-good scenes being pointed out as examples (i.e.: "giving her a shoulder to cry on) this doesn't mean anything, it was a scene written by the writers to propel a narrative. Just as the show stereotypes nerds, it stereotypes jocks. I can assure you, I, nor the vast majority of athletic men, are airheads like the jocks out of Revenge of the Nerds. I am actually incredibly intelligent, the fact that I have a well defined body is incidental. Nobody just

I'm not Sure who this Kurt character is, but it isn't me. I literally googled "Big Bang theory forums" and this was the first match. Basically I just wanted to rant. Of course the post isn't completely serious, but I do have some valid points. I don't watch the show, or any TV for that matter, but whenever I catch this show, it's on the TVs at my Gym. As far as myself, no, I'm not jealous or petty. I am a very good looking guy. I am white, 6'0 tall, 176 Lbs, 25 years old with good muscle tone, blond hair and light blue eyes. I get many looks from attractive girls all the time, I'm not con

This show is hilariously, ridiculously inaccurate in regards to the rules of attraction. While looks aren't everything, it's sickening that hot women are fawning over super skinny, dorky losers who have no game and no confidence. This doesn't happen in real life. Sheldon is ridiculously skinny and anti social, and is definitely not attractive to most women. Same with the rest of the cast. What fantasy world does this show take place in, where gorgeous blonds are competing for the affection of these skinny loser beta males? I thinks it's condescending to women to portray this. The male equiv