Jump to content
The Big Bang Theory Forums

Aevitas

Members
  • Content Count

    198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About Aevitas

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday July 12

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female

Big Bang Theory Opinions

  • Favorite Cast Members
    Jim Parsons
    Mayim Bialik
    Melissa Rauch
  • Favorite Characters
    Sheldon
    Amy
  • Favorite Episode
    The Adhesive Duck Deficiency

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I agree with the comments so far. I LOVED Sheldon in this episode. He's been kinda wonky since the beginning of season 5, but there were so many parts where it shows some of his old habits have stuck around and somewhat "adapted" to the new Sheldon, and it worked really well this episode. Even the bits with just the girls were well done IMO. Heck, everyone was good this episode. Raj and Stuart weren't embarrassingly pathetic (and trying to get some ladies, just like the single Wolowitz days), Leonard wasn't super clingy, Amy wasn't creepy, Bernadette wasn't Howard's mom (don't get me wrong, I find it funny, but they relied on it a little too much in Season 5), and Sheldon wasn't an unnecessary ass. Whoever wrote this episode, get them to do more. The balance in this episode was perfect! I kinda got a bit of the soul of the earlier seasons in this one!
  2. We discussed a lot of the contradictions in this thread.
  3. I'm certain I've unintentionally memorized huge chunks of episodes just by playing them in the background. I'm always on the computer doing all kinds of work, so I play TBBT for background noise. So no, I don't find it weird.
  4. Out of curiosity, do you happen to know what the original line was before they changed it?
  5. I think the people who watched the series in one straight shot have an advantage. I watched Season 1-4 in a row, and I thought the whole thing was great. Then when I started watching Season 5 one episode at a time on TV with everyone else, I felt like the show wasn't as funny as it used to be, and agreed with many of the complaints. I'm still enjoying an episode here and there, but nowhere as often as the previous seasons. I wonder if there's some kind of influence that comes with only watching one episode at a time that makes people overly critical. I'll see when I rewatch Seasons 1-5 again and see if it changes my perspective.
  6. I see it as an extension of the clause that said that hand-holding is ok for moral support during flu shots. It may not be a flu shot, but it's definitely moral support.
  7. Thought you guys might appreciate this one:
  8. On one hand, lots of fans see Subtext, hints, and evidence where there really isn't; So so true in this fandom. A big problem with that is that they try to place these characters into our world, our reality. Our reality is static. Theirs is dynamic. Their lives and histories don't have to be a straight solid line, or even make sense. We've already heard Bernadette say her mom ran an illegal day care center, then later said her mom worked and Bernie had to take care of her brothers and sisters. This is a contradiction. Put it into our world, it doesn't make sense. Why would Bernie's mom work at an illegal daycare, in her own basement even, and not let her own kids go? But in the TV world, it doesn't have to make sense or be consistent, it just has to make us laugh. Prady was asked about this via twitter, he responded that Bernardette's mom worked outside home before getting the illegal daycare center. I know, it just seems like a way to repair a previous slip, but at least he cared to came up with an answer That still didn't explain how Bernadette was good with children in one episode, and then hates them in another though. I think that is the bigger issue here.
  9. What about The Work Song Nanocluster, or the Dead Hooker Juxtaposition?
  10. I did not find anything wrong in showing Sheldon having an interest in flags in one episode but not before or after. Since we only see so much of them on-screen, many things about them can come up apparently out of the blue for one storyline, and it's reasonable to assume that it was there but we just didn't get to see that particular interest or activity earlier because it wasn't relevant to previous on-screen events. That itself doesn't make it out of character. For example, Sheldon went crazy over the graphene problem, but we never heard of it again. Or his love of trains, or his love of monkeys, or his suddenly learning Finnish - they've all got one-off mentions. The idea is that Sheldon has a number of offbeat, quirky interests. This one, at least, had an on-screen precedent in his making the apartment flag (which does indicate a sufficient degree of interest in the concept). Also, he has a fetish for knowledge/information of all kinds. I agree that the dressing-up scene at the end was purely for laughs, and can be seen as over-the-top by some. What I enjoyed about that scene was Leonard's expression as he hurriedly made his exit. While you are correct about Sheldon fixating on random things, Fun with Flags was something that he supposedly had planned a year's worth of material for. To be that dedicated to something but not have any background information from the show just didn't sit right for me. The graphene problem was as a whole a physics problem, and we know that he's constantly thinking about that since it's part of his job. He no longer was thinking about the graphene issue because he solved it, as is with any physics topic he would be thinking of at the time. It was also mentioned in several episodes that he likes trains, so there is premise for that, but I'm not sure about the monkeys. As for things like learning Finnish, it's something he quickly picked up when he was formatting his hard drives. As he said, "Once I learn Finnish, I'm not going to learn Finnish again." It's a passing thing for him, and he certain didn't dedicate a whole year's worth of material to learn it. Truth be told though, the Bavarian get-up at the end bothered me much more than the Fun with Flags segment itself.
  11. We can only say his mom loved him. The show has given us zero information that would allow us to draw a conclusion on how much Sheldon's father loved him. We know for certain that Sheldon's dad consistently was trying to teach him football and get him to watch it until he went off to college, he taught him archery, and also how to shoot so close to a raccoon that it craps itself. To me, those sound like activities a father tries to have with his son to bond together. His father was also the one to assure his wife that "you have to take your time with Sheldon." Sounds like a man who cares for his son. Whether Sheldon saw that or not is not the point, we can safely say that both his parents loved him through these attempts. Who said their families were "identical"? What is seriously flawed is an argument which is based on something that was never said. To say they were both loved means just that - they were both loved. It's a simple thing. It's also a huge thing. Whether a person is loved or not as a child plays a big influence on his/her psyche. It's a very interesting factoid. Loving or abusive background is something that often informs who we are as people - it's certainly something that's very important to know if you want to understand what drives a person. Why can't they be compared like that? People can be compared based on anything. Family background is actually one of the very fundamental things that can be easily compared. What I meant to say was that "being loved" isn't binary. You're not just "loved" or "not loved." For example, like I was trying to explain before, we know that Penny's dad loved her, but there were still psychological issues behind it to the point that Penny cries when talking about it. Back in Season 1, before we met her father face to face, would we have thought her father truly loved her? Even with Leonard's mom, I'm sure she does love Leonard, but she just doesn't know how to express it in the conventional sense. She seemed bothered that Leonard didn't tell her he was dating Penny, why would a mother who doesn't care want to know things like that? Every family dynamic is different, and it's very difficult to say for certain people were loved/not loved in their families.
  12. I agree. The rigorous taping of a nerdy podcast, as well as dressing up in that way, were quite consistent with Sheldon's character. I did initially feel that the dressing up was a bit OOC for Amy, but then we have to remember that she has changed a lot since the time Sheldon lamented 'she's not the free spirit that I am'. Here is my take, I don't know if other people who didn't like Fun with Flags will agree with me. For one thing, Sheldon has never mentioned in all 5 seasons that he has a deep interest in flags. The only time he ever mentioned a flag was when he made one for their apartment. To me, it sounded like the writers were thinking about what material to give Sheldon and went, "Hey, Sheldon mentioned he had a flag for their apartment, maybe we can write him in an episode where all he talks about is flags, because he clearly loves flags based on that one instance." And then he never mentions flags ever again after that. The OCDness of it was what his character would do, but why this subject? The costumes at the end also bothered me. While yes, Sheldon does wear costumes, that was always for cosplaying comic book characters and some such. The costumes he and Amy wore for Fun with Flags was just for cheap laughs from the writers, as in, "Ha ha, look how extreme they've gotten with their podcast! Don't they look ridiculous?!" Best way to describe it, it showed Sheldon's personality, but not his character.
  13. I think people have forgotten that Penny's father wasn't perfect either. He wanted Penny to be a boy and treated her like one until she hit puberty. This obviously doesn't mean that he didn't love her, but seeing that Penny mentioned that he sent her a catcher's mitt for Christmas in Season 3, he still has underlying issues about it. This could be the reason for her experimenting with drugs (the bag of "potpourri"), sleeping around (it was mentioned twice that she took a pregnancy test when she was young), trying to sort out her identity through other men. As for Mary Cooper, Sheldon mentioned once that she smokes in the car and kept it a secret from his dad. For an "upstanding Christian," this would stand to be a serious vice, probably a form of release for her for some kind of issue she's wrestling with. Not to mention the fight Sheldon described in Season 3 where his mom said Jesus would forgive her for putting ground glass into her husband's meatloaf, while Sheldon's dad skeet shoots his mom's collectible plates on the roof. The fighting clearly had an impact on Sheldon, since now he can't stand it when anyone fights. However, we do know for certain that his parents did love him in the many ways they've shown it. In short, I think to say that their family lives are identical is seriously flawed. And to say that they're both loved doesn't mean that everything was hunky dory either. These two can't really be compared like that.
  14. It really comes down to the writers. Some know how to write the Sheldon character, some don't. The writers responsible for The Vacation Solution and The Launch Acceleration seem to have a good grasp of him and know how to evolve him in a way that doesn't shake the audience out of their suspension of disbelief. Whoever wrote the episode with Fun with Flags seemed to misinterpret him (and Amy) completely. I am looking forward to the next season with the hope that Sheldon will continue to be handled with kid gloves, and ideally move in the right direction so I can continue loving his antics and quirkiness on the show under a new paradigm (namely his relationship status).
  15. We actually did get a teeny tiny glimpse of what this could be like in the Maternal Congruence in Season 3. Sheldon and Beverly psychoanalyzing Leonard's narcissistic personality disorder over a video chat (like parents discussing a problematic child), Sheldon sending a wedding gift from both of them (like a parent taking responsibility for social convention for another family member who isn't as close to the couple), reasoning with Leonard for euthanizing his dog ("She was old and blind, Leonard. What choice did we have?" implying that he made that decision together with Beverly), etc. The only time we see Sheldon act more mature than Leonard is when he's with Leonard's mom. I will say right now that aside from the last example I gave, they could be explained without any familial connection, but it's one possibility of interpreting as such. After saying all that, I do think those bits were humorous, and as long as they kept the relationship as an unintentional implication, I think I'd be fine with it, similar to how Raj and Howard end up saying things to each other that suggest a homosexual relationship but there really isn't anything there. However, with Amy in the picture, that dynamic may not be shown again anyway, so my post is essentially just speculation and observation from a time past.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.