3ku11 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 A monkey could write better stories then these fools. In fact thats who i exactly invision in the writers room. Monkeys jumping on tables. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meka3000 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 (edited) You're embarrassing yourself. You have NOTHING to refute Stardust's post. absolutely NOTHING. You're wasting your time.again check his cal tech post which I refuted. The one who's embarrassing themself is you, by claiming I had nothing to refute Stardust's point despite my post refuting his post about cal techs history has been up for almost 24 hours. Edited August 15, 2015 by meka3000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tensor Posted August 15, 2015 Author Share Posted August 15, 2015 Prove that i'm wrong then. Being in the minority does not automatically make a person wrong.That's the beauty of this, you have proven yourself wrong, by not showing vasu is wrong. Simply saying it doesn't make sense to you, does not make it wrong for vasu to say it doesn't make sense to him. Argument from incredulity isn't valid. Now, if you can show vasu is absolutely wrong to say it doesn't make sense, without using hypotheticals or incredulity, you may have a point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RudyG Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Your post is very informative, thank you very much. However I believe you might have a problem with reading comprehension. What I said is that I didn't remember a sitcom with more drama. more indicates quantity, not quality of the drama or intensity, or magnitude. What I was looking for that your post failed to demonstrate was series which during their run had an equal or greater amount of drama. That is what I couldn't think of, and still can't. As I'm saying it's the amount (and frequency) of the drama not the intensity.No Stardust he didn't, or if he did he knit picked the part that was opposing to his so that he could refute your post which was irrefutable, and in my opinion the best post on the subject. It explains everything clearly and makes complete sense. Shame on you! You should know our friend Meka can't take that ;-)Carlos, I replied to one of your posts, but you ignored my response. If you want to find a comedy that has way more drama then TBBT it is Mom. There are episodes of Mom that are so depressing you wonder how the characters continue to go on. It's a brilliant show, but at times it's very dark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meka3000 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Argument from incredulity isn't valid. This coming from the person back in may who said they couldn't believe Leonard would not push back a girl kissing him right away while in a drunken state. Just because you did it while you were away from your significant other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tensor Posted August 15, 2015 Author Share Posted August 15, 2015 (edited) This coming from the person back in may who said they couldn't believe Leonard would not push back a girl kissing him right away while in a drunken state. Just because you did it while you were away from your significant other. LOL, you have that wrong. I said I felt it was cheating because there was, to use Leonard's expression "there was kissing" of another woman, even if he was drunk. It is. I didn't claim someone was wrong using incredulity as the argument, as you did. Oh, and by the way, that's an ad hominem,: directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining. Contrary to a lot of beliefs, it's not necessarily an attack on a person (and I don't look at it that way). This is simply you trying to hide the fact that you haven't shown vasu wrong and are trying to hide that fact. Which still mean you've proved yourself wrong as you haven't shown vasu to be wrong for saying it makes no sense to him. Edited August 15, 2015 by Tensor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3ku11 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Leonard lieing to Penny about something that never existed up till now for two years. About a women he kissed, drunk or not and has been working with for two years. So if were going off how they have written Lenny the past two seasons. Its a valid pov to say makes no sense. Its a pov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meka3000 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 To claim that there will be some sort of huge explanation requires an assumption that there is going to be something that explains this. But we don't know if there are going to be any such explanation.What are you basing your assumption that we aren't going to get anything on? It's also an assumption to believe that we won't get anything either.Though IMO it is a reasonable assumption to think we will based on us learning more about this situation from s9s premiere following s8s finale, and that 9x02 will have Mandy in it. Each episode dwelling on this incident has given new information to us. So why assume the next one won't when the girl herself will be in it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tensor Posted August 15, 2015 Author Share Posted August 15, 2015 (edited) What are you basing your assumption that we aren't going to get anything on? I'm not claiming there is will or won't be an explanation. I'm just saying you have to assume that there will be. It's also an assumption to believe that we won't get anything either.Of course it is. But I'm not telling anyone they are wrong for that. That's not what is happening here. You are telling him he's wrong for saying it doesn't make sense, based on his assumption. But, somehow you seem to think that is ok, for you to do using an assumption. And you haven't show anything definitive to show your assumption is somehow better. other than thinking your's is better. Though IMO it isnip...herself will be in it?Still trying to avoid the fact that you haven't show vasu to be wrong, which means you proved yourself wrong. Edited August 15, 2015 by Tensor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3ku11 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 I think Sheldon calling Amy a vixen is his a interpretation of attractiveness haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrismo Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Sheldon has made comments about people being attractive before. Just because it is not something that he finds terribly important doesn't mean that he can't tell or doesn't notice when someone is attractive.if it's not terribly important why would he make the comment? In regards to the amount of times a couple at the most. Actually he's had more insults on the way Amy looks than compliments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickelette424 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 if it's not terribly important why would he make the comment? In regards to the amount of times a couple at the most. Actually he's had more insults on the way Amy looks than compliments. It's not important to him, but it is something to is important to people like Penny and especially Leonard. He wasn't the subject of the conversation. Leonard and Penny were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meka3000 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Leonard lieing to Penny about something that never existed up till now for two years.Sure it existed, we just didn't know it did until 8x24. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrismo Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 It's not important to him, but it is something to is important to people like Penny and especially Leonard. He wasn't the subject of the conversation. Leonard and Penny were.He purposely said it IMO to be an ass. The only reason he went over there was to talk about himself. But it sounds like Penny got even by telling him he's a bad boyfriend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3ku11 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 He purposely said it IMO to be an ass. The only reason he went over there was to talk about himself. But it sounds like Penny got even by telling him he's a bad boyfriend.he is a bad boyfriend tho lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meka3000 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Still trying to avoid the fact that you haven't show vasu to be wrong, which means you proved yourself wrong. No it doesn't it just means I haven't shown anything. It doesn't automatically mean I'm wrong or right.If your so convinced I'm wrong, why are you trying to beat this dead horse over and over, by asking me for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrismo Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 he is a bad boyfriend tho lol. True. Mandy being attractive is open to interpretation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tensor Posted August 15, 2015 Author Share Posted August 15, 2015 (edited) No it doesn't it just means I haven't shown anything. It doesn't automatically mean I'm wrong or right. Yep you haven't shown anything. Like your claim vasu is wrong for saying it doesn't make sense to him. By saying it was presumptuous of him.If your so convinced I'm wrong, why are you trying to beat this dead horse over and over, by asking me for this?Because you keep trying to claim it was valid of you to say vasu saying "it made no sense to him" was presumptuous. Then you demanded that someone else show you were wrong. I'm just showing you are still wrong about it, even though you try to claim otherwise. Edited August 15, 2015 by Tensor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3ku11 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 True. Mandy being attractive is open to interpretation.Shandy i ship it!,haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrismo Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Shandy i ship it!,haha. Penny and Amy come to confront Mandy and see her talking to Sheldon. penny can tell Amy this skank is your problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3ku11 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Penny and Amy come to confront Mandy and see her talking to Sheldon. penny can tell Amy this skank is your problem.lol be funny if she.starts dating all the guys. Goes for Sheldon then Raj, then Stuart, then Kripke.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meka3000 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 I'm just showing you are still wrong about it,If you've shown me that im wrong, then why are you still asking me to provide something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tensor Posted August 15, 2015 Author Share Posted August 15, 2015 If you've shown me that im wrong, then why are you still asking me to provide something?Hmmmmmmm...could be because...No it doesn't it just means I haven't shown anything. It doesn't automatically mean I'm wrong or right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3ku11 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 (edited) To be fair Mika you started it simply because you wanted vasu to provide evidence for saying it makes no sense, which is a valid pov. And your the one who keeps responding to.the same thing. Just saying. It makes no.sense as since s6 it diddnt exist, so from a writing standpoint it contradicts Leonards character history. Why reveal to Priya just.another women he dated, he cheated. But Leonard 90% be honest about his life. Not to mention the fact, it was established only one caltech employee could go on the hawking trip. Then we find out not only that Leonard cheated, but with a collegue who hes been working with him for two years. Does that make sense to you? Because it doesent to me. Creating this women out of thin air, just to create artificial angst and delay living arrangements, lacks continuity. Thats my pov, your free to disagree with it. Edited August 15, 2015 by 3ku11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meka3000 Posted August 15, 2015 Share Posted August 15, 2015 Hmmmmmmm...could be because...and you think that means I'm going to provide you anything after the first 50 million times that you asked because......? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now