Jump to content

[Spoilers] Discussion Topic: Season 9


Tensor

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ha, I thought I've read about the car-accident before. The News-article was from 08/14/15. Tensor said this on 08/12/15. Either someone is a psychic or this rumor originated from this Forum...

As I said, Shamy gal mentioned something traumatic, like a car accident, so the writer in me just went with it. I'm just wondering if someone was googling and came upon that and thought it was somehow from an official site( that happens, even though we do specify that we are unofficial. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We know what motivated it, absolutely nothing.

His motivation is irrelevant. 

No we don't.

His motivation can add or detract to the complexity of the situation when determining how much blame he deserves.  So no, its not irrelevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said that it may take something traumatic like an accident to see what they could be losing.  It also makes a point of saying that it would bring the other characters to the fore, which it would do if any two of the main couples are stuck in hospital for a period of time.

Car crash? Who? Did i really heard it right?? Wew! I read a fan fic similar to that one.. Sent from my GT-S5360 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, you just constructed increasingly complex scenarios trying to show he was drunk, when Leonard never said that.  Why do that unless you didn't accept his word the he said as only seasick?

Increasingly complex=\=impossible.

He brought up alcohol being involved, and if the tr is to be trusted, he used the words he was drunk directly to reaffirm that. I also never said I didn't accept his word that he was seasick.

Also he never said he was ONLY seasick and nothing else.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Increasingly complex=\=impossible.

Yeah, we know, unless, in  someone else comes up with a scenario you don't like, then you'll imply or say increasingly complex is impossible.  

 

 

He brought up alcohol being involved, and if the tr is to be trusted, he used the words he was drunk directly to reaffirm that. 

Oh, I see, now you trust the TR, but then you have to have it be trusted here.  But I understand, you're questioning of the TR matched the fact that what Michy said, didn't fit with your scenario of the time  

 

Also he never said he was ONLY seasick and nothing else.

 So, you are saying he was lying by omission, got it.

Does penny's last name become revealed?

Well, there was a report that Chuck Lorre said it was Barrington, but I can't find anything that confirms that.  Penny was addressed as Mrs Hofstadter, but I doubt she's actually gotten her name changed at this point.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, there was a report that Chuck Lorre said it was Barrington, but I can't find anything that confirms that.  Penny was addressed as Mrs Hofstadter, but I doubt she's actually gotten her name changed at this point.  

Where is this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Well, there was a report that Chuck Lorre said it was Barrington, but I can't find anything that confirms that.  Penny was addressed as Mrs Hofstadter, but I doubt she's actually gotten her name changed at this point.  

Well, I found this: http://www.realtytoday.com/articles/20690/20150716/big-bang-theory-season-9-spoiler-alert-shamy-ups-ante.htm#disqus_thread

Can't say how reliable this is, though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not very.  That report cites a source (Master Hearld in OMAN no less), that cites The Inquisitr (which is nothing more than a rag paper), cites another source (MoviePlot, which gets 90% or more of it's content from fans)  as claiming Chuck Lorre confirmed Barrington in an interview.  However, there is not trace of that supposed interview anywhere.  Throughout those reports, they also say that Penny may be related to one of the other characters, and that her biological father will show up (so what happened with Wyatt?).  IOW, not very believable.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carlos, I replied to one of your posts, but you ignored my response. If you want to find a comedy that has way more drama then TBBT it is Mom. There are episodes of Mom that are so depressing you wonder how the characters continue to go on. It's a brilliant show, but at times it's very dark. 

I didn't answer to you because I haven't seen Mom so I can't say. In my original post I believe I said that I didn't remember a sitcom with as much drama as TBBT meaning sitcoms that had come before it. You might be totally right, but I think Mom is pretty new. At any rate what I was trying to say with my original comment that I didn't believe I've seen a sitcom with so much drama was pointing at the fact that so much drama is interfering with my enjoyment of the show and of course undermining how funny it is, thus failing (as a comedy). It is my personal belief that in order for there to be comedy there has to be conflict, but not necessarily drama. I welcome a little bit of it, but not what to me is way too much,

Finally Rudy, didn't mean to make you feel as if I was ignoring your answer, just that as I mentioned I haven't seen Mom. 

Just read something about a potential car accident involving the two main couples in episode two. 

Ohhhhhh Yessssss!!!! I hope it's the writers, and they're all in the car!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And for anyone about to get their panties in bunch, it's just a joke, OK?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since its the women who are mad I would probably go with writing that the guys were the ones getting hurt, but there are a lot of ways to go with it. 

That would make sense.  However, If it's Amy whose hurt, wouldn't that be a good way to bring her family into it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree it is pretty stupid, but on the off-hand chance it's not, I'm just looking to see what they could do with it if they did do it.

Yeah, I suppose. I say this even though I really wanna hit whoever spread this silly rumour with a dictionary haha. This must be how tabloid celebrity rumours get spread...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.